I do not have time to be doing this right now. I have two websites to edit, I have to pack for my Portland trip, I have a long list of things to do around the house, and I have a blog post to write for a very special birthday.
But this World Vision thing. Honestly, I just can’t even.
On the slim chance you do not know what I am talking about, World Vision, that fantastic organization that serves thousands of impoverished communities around the world, made a sudden and, depending on how you look at it, brave or foolish change to its hiring policies. Basically, they decided that while they were continuing to enforce their standards on fidelity and abstinence (depending on one’s marital status), they would also allow legally married homosexual couples to work for them.
(You can read the original announcement here.)
Obviously, the reaction from both supporters and opposers was immediate and very loud, with progressive Christian leaders rejoicing and conservative Evangelicals basically throwing so many tantrums. Worse, a few Evangelical leaders called on Christians to withdraw their support from World Vision over the matter, essentially telling their followers to literally take food and medicine from poor children’s mouths and communities. World Vision was forced to retreat, and they have since retracted their statement.
When I first read Mr. Stearn’s letter, I was thrilled. I thought that World Vision was taking a brave but risky stand, and I wanted to show my support. However, one thing I never thought about doing was moving my sponsorship dollars from Help One Now to World Vision.
Why? Because I do not sponsor little Lamar to feel good; I sponsor him because I felt called by Jesus to help him. I didn’t look over our budget and decide that we should massage our egos and do a little extra for someone. Honestly, things are tight and we could use the $40. But I made a commitment to him. He is a real person, a real child, and he and his community depend on me to help them get the things that they need to survive. His community should not suffer because some other organization did something that I like.
World Vision’s sponsorship model differs from the model used by Help One Now in that, in Help One Now’s case, sponsorship funds go to the child’s community at large so that every child benefits. In World Vision’s case, the sponsorship dollars go to that particular child (and perhaps his or her family). So, canceling your support has a direct impact on that — your — child.
In the past two days, it has been estimated that over 2,000 people stopped sponsoring their child because of World Vision’s initial decision. I do not know if we will ever know the exact number, but let’s stop and think about that for a second. Over 2,000 people decided to stop feeding, clothing, medicating, and educating their sponsored child because they were afraid that the guy who answered the phone might have a husband instead of a wife and they might get gay cooties through the phone or something. Remember: they have (hopefully) been praying for, writing letters to, and receiving letters from their child. And yet, at a drop of a hat, because they got offended, that child is back to starving.
Great job, internet.
Let me be even more clear: if you canceled your sponsorship over this issue, you are a bad person. The end. This means that you are not sponsoring your child for the sake of the child, but to make yourself feel good.
Because these children are the very definition of “the least of these.” Because now, the hot, smelly, dirty, World Vision worker that is on the ground in Tanzania, or Peru, or Laos has to look at some of these children and say, “I’m sorry. No letters for you today, and I can’t give you any more food, either. Your sponsor got mad, took his ball, and went home.”
And, for the record, if you cancel your sponsorship because World Vision reversed its course on this, you are also a bad person. Nadia Bolz-Weber reminded us, “The critique of pulling support for charity due to an employee hiring practice I disagree with has to cut both ways or it’s bullshit.”
At the end of the day, World Vision’s announcement should have let to an amazing set of conversations as churches, charities, non-profits, and NGO’s have to start navigating this world and its changing social values while staying true. Instead, we just stuck our thumbs in the eyes of gay people everywhere.
And we wonder why young people are leaving the Church in droves.
Ben Moberg wrote a devastating post highlighting the pain this is causing the gay and lesbian community, saying: “this is what I’m hearing: No, you aren’t even worthy to serve hungry children. You are so deeply unwanted that I will let a child die if it keeps you away from me. From us. From the body of Christ. I will spare no life if it keeps you far away.”
Sigh.
I can’t even.
For better, more nuanced takes on this, please read:
Jen Hatmaker (“The church has never, not for one millisecond of its entire history, been right about everything. This sobering fact should give us pause and inject some much needed humility into our ethos.”)
Nish Weiseth (“When you withdraw your sponsorship, the person who pays the price is an undeserving child.”)
Rachel Held Evans (“Deliberately cutting off funding to your sponsored child affects that child and her community. If you didn’t think that money was actually making a difference, then why were you sponsoring to begin with?”)
PS: I read a lot of articles and blogs over the last few days, and if I inadvertently quoted one without the proper attribution, please forgive me.